socialhousing.ai ← Back to tools hub
Regulatory · Asset Management

C&C Standard Readiness — Repairs & Maintenance

Assess your organisation's preparedness for the Competence & Conduct Standard (in force October 2026), focused on the Repairs & Maintenance function within asset management. Work through each theme, tick evidence items, set your RAG and build your action plan.

6 themes · 36 evidence items In force October 2026 Nothing saved — browser only No data captured or stored
Important — not a regulatory judgement. This tool gives an indicative snapshot based on what you enter. It is not a formal compliance assessment. The RSH's view of any provider takes into account a much broader range of evidence and context. Use this alongside — not instead of — your own governance, risk and assurance processes. The Competence & Conduct Standard comes into force in October 2026 — most obligations apply from that date. The qualification element has a separate transition period: 3 years for large providers (1,000+ units), 4 years for smaller providers. 'Working towards' a qualification means genuinely enrolled and progressing, not parked.
1
Green — Ready
3
Amber — Developing
2
Red — Gap
6 / 13
Themes rated
Significant gaps
Overall position

About this tool

The Competence and Conduct Standard comes into force in October 2026, sitting within the Transparency, Influence & Accountability (TI&A) Standard. It applies to all staff delivering housing management services — including those managing repairs and maintenance and asset management functions. This tool structures your self-assessment across the six themes most relevant to R&M: workforce competence, conduct and culture, qualifications, governance and policy, R&M delivery capability, and assurance.

RAG position by theme

Rate outcomes on each tab — your position across all six themes is shown here.

Workforce Competence
1 Amber2 Red
3/3 rated
Conduct & Culture
2 Not rated
0/2 rated
Qualifications
2 Not rated
0/2 rated
Governance & Policy
2 Amber
2/2 rated
R&M Delivery
3 Not rated
0/3 rated
Assurance
1 Green
1/1 rated

Theme 1 — Workforce Competence

The standard requires landlords to ensure staff delivering housing management services — including repairs and maintenance management — have the appropriate skills, knowledge and experience for their roles. This is an outcomes-based requirement: the RSH will look for evidence of systems, not just certificates.

3 / 6 outcomes rated
0 green · 1 amber · 2 red
WF01
Role mapping and competency framework for R&M staff
All roles within the R&M function identified, scoped and mapped to competency requirements.
4 / 7
Amber — Developing
Evidence checklist — tick each item fully in place
  • Every role in the R&M function has been assessed against the scope criteria in the C&C Policy Statement — the test is whether the individual has a substantive role managing the delivery of housing management services, not whether they carry out work directly. Roles likely in scope include: R&M Manager, Repairs Manager, Asset Manager, Surveying Manager, Contract Manager, Capital Works Manager, Head of Repairs, Director of Asset Management (if they hold substantive management accountability for R&M delivery). Roles likely out of scope include: operatives and trades staff carrying out repairs; subcontractors; surveyors who solely carry out surveys without management responsibility; back-office functions (finance, HR, procurement) with no substantive housing management role. Note — the standard applies to Subsection B: Technical housing management roles, and scope is determined by function and seniority, not job title alone.
  • A competency framework or role profile exists for each in-scope R&M role, setting out the required skills, knowledge and experience
  • Senior housing managers and executives with R&M responsibilities have been identified by name, with their scope of accountability documented
  • The competency framework distinguishes between technical/trade competency and housing management competency for relevant roles
  • Any contracted-out R&M services have been reviewed to determine whether the contractor's management staff are in scope for the standard
  • Interim and temporary staff in R&M management roles have been included in scope mapping — not just permanent employees
  • Role profiles have been reviewed and updated in the last 24 months to reflect current service delivery models and regulatory requirements
Checklist: 4/7 confirmed — 40–74% — Amber suggested. Accept below or set your own.
RAG rating — override at any time
Notes
Flag as priority for action plan
WF02
Training needs analysis for R&M managers
Structured assessment of current capability gaps against required competence levels.
2 / 6
Red — Gap
Evidence checklist — tick each item fully in place
  • A formal training needs analysis (TNA) has been completed for all in-scope R&M staff within the last 12 months
  • The TNA includes both housing management knowledge and technical/asset management competencies relevant to the R&M function
  • Gaps identified in the TNA have been recorded with named individuals, priority levels and planned closure dates
  • The TNA findings have been shared with senior leadership and there is a funded plan to address the highest-priority gaps
  • Progress against training gap closure is tracked and reported to management at least every six months
  • The TNA is reviewed and updated whenever a new member of staff joins an R&M management role
Checklist: 2/6 confirmed — under 40% — Red suggested. Accept below or set your own.
RAG rating — override at any time
Notes
Flag as priority for action plan
WF03
Ongoing learning and professional development
Continuous development culture embedded across R&M management — not just induction.
1 / 6
Red — Gap
Evidence checklist — tick each item fully in place
  • Every in-scope R&M manager has an active Personal Development Plan (PDP) reviewed at appraisal and at least annually
  • A learning and development budget is allocated specifically to R&M management staff — and it has been spent in the last 12 months
  • CPD records are maintained for all in-scope staff and are accessible for regulatory scrutiny
  • Training on relevant regulatory changes (e.g. Awaab's Law, Building Safety Act, new consumer standards) is delivered within a defined timescale of the change coming into force
  • The impact of learning interventions is assessed — completion alone is not treated as evidence of competence
  • At least one sector-facing development opportunity (conference, peer network, professional body membership) is supported per manager per year
Checklist: 1/6 confirmed — under 40% — Red suggested. Accept below or set your own.
RAG rating — override at any time
Notes
Flag as priority for action plan

Theme 2 — Conduct & Culture

The standard requires providers to have a written code of conduct and to manage poor performance and misconduct consistently. In the R&M context, this covers the behaviour of managers and those managing contractors — including how staff treat tenants during repair interactions.

0 / 4 outcomes rated
0 green · 0 amber · 0 red
CO01
Code of conduct covering R&M management roles
Documented standards of behaviour applicable to all staff in R&M management functions.
0 / 6
Not rated
Evidence checklist
  • A written code of conduct exists that covers all in-scope housing management staff including R&M management roles
  • The code of conduct includes expectations around how tenants are treated — specifically in the context of repair visits, complaints and vulnerability
  • All in-scope R&M staff have signed or acknowledged the code of conduct and this is recorded
  • The code of conduct has been reviewed within the last two years and updated to reflect the C&C Standard requirements
  • Contractor management staff and key supply chain managers have been made aware of behavioural expectations — even if a separate code applies to them
  • Breaches of the code of conduct by R&M staff are investigated and outcomes are recorded
Tick items above to generate a RAG suggestion.
RAG rating — override at any time
Notes
Flag as priority for action plan
CO02
Appraisal and performance management for R&M managers
Structured annual appraisal cycle with documented performance reviews and poor performance management processes.
0 / 6
Not rated
Evidence checklist
  • All in-scope R&M management staff have an annual appraisal completed within the last 12 months — with no overdue reviews
  • Appraisals explicitly assess conduct and professional behaviour — not just task performance or output targets
  • A written policy for managing poor performance exists and applies to in-scope R&M roles
  • Line managers responsible for R&M staff have received training on conducting effective performance reviews
  • Appraisal completion rates are monitored and reported to HR or senior leadership at least annually
  • Poor performance in R&M roles linked to tenant outcomes (e.g. repeated service failures) triggers a structured management response
Tick items above to generate a RAG suggestion.
RAG rating — override at any time
Notes
Flag as priority for action plan

Theme 3 — Qualifications

From October 2026, senior housing managers and executives in scope must hold — or be working towards — a relevant housing management qualification (TQT over 120 hours). For R&M roles, existing technical qualifications (CIOB, RICS, CABE) may be partially recognised, with top-up modules required to cover housing management elements. Operatives carrying out repairs are not required to hold housing management qualifications.

0 / 6 outcomes rated
0 green · 0 amber · 0 red
QU01
Qualification audit for in-scope R&M staff
Current qualification status mapped for all in-scope individuals — identifying gaps and partial compliance.
0 / 6
Not rated
Evidence checklist
  • A complete register of in-scope R&M management staff exists, showing current qualifications held for each individual
  • Each qualification has been assessed against the government's course content criteria to determine full, partial or non-compliance
  • Staff with technical qualifications (CIOB, RICS, HNC etc.) have had those qualifications formally reviewed against C&C requirements — with top-up needs identified where applicable
  • Staff who hold no relevant qualification have been identified and a plan for enrolment within the transition period is in place
  • The qualification audit is maintained as a live document and updated whenever a staff member joins, leaves or completes a qualification
  • The qualification register has been reviewed by HR and the relevant director within the last six months
Tick items above to generate a RAG suggestion.
RAG rating — override at any time
Notes
Flag as priority for action plan
QU02
Enrolment and transition plan within required timescales
Funded, timetabled plan ensuring all in-scope staff are enrolled and progressing within 3 or 4-year transition period.
0 / 6
Not rated
Evidence checklist
  • The applicable transition period for the organisation has been confirmed (3 years for 1,000+ units; 4 years for under 1,000 units) and documented
  • An enrolment timetable exists that will bring all in-scope R&M staff into qualification compliance before the end of the transition period
  • A qualified training provider or awarding body has been identified and a relationship established for the preferred qualification route
  • A budget covering qualification costs, study time and backfill (where required) has been approved by the board or executive
  • New R&M management staff (including interims) are enrolled on a qualification within 12 months of starting their role — a process is in place to trigger this
  • Progress against the enrolment plan is reported to the board or a designated committee at least annually
Tick items above to generate a RAG suggestion.
RAG rating — override at any time
Notes
Flag as priority for action plan

Theme 4 — Governance & Policy

The standard requires a written policy setting out the organisation's approach to managing and developing the skills, knowledge, experience and conduct of relevant staff. For R&M functions this needs to be operational — not a document that sits on a shelf.

2 / 6 outcomes rated
0 green · 2 amber · 0 red
GO01
Written C&C policy covering R&M housing management roles
Published internal policy setting out how competence and conduct is managed, developed and assured.
4 / 7
Amber — Developing
Evidence checklist
  • A written Competence and Conduct Policy exists (or is in formal development with a board-approved target date)
  • The policy explicitly covers in-scope R&M management roles and references the C&C Standard requirements
  • The policy sets out the organisation's approach to training needs analysis, qualification enrolment and CPD
  • The policy describes how poor performance and misconduct is managed for in-scope staff
  • The policy has been approved by the board or a relevant governance committee
  • All in-scope R&M managers have been made aware of the policy and their obligations under it
  • The policy has a review date no more than two years from its last revision
Checklist: 4/7 confirmed — 40–74% — Amber suggested. Accept below or set your own.
RAG rating — override at any time
Notes
Flag as priority for action plan
GO02
Board and executive oversight of C&C compliance
Senior accountability, board reporting and governance structures are in place for C&C readiness.
3 / 5
Amber — Developing
Evidence checklist
  • A named executive director has formal accountability for C&C Standard readiness — including the R&M function
  • The board has received at least one briefing on the C&C Standard and the organisation's preparedness in the last 12 months
  • C&C readiness is on the corporate risk register with a named owner and a current assessment of risk level
  • Progress against the C&C transition plan is reported to a board or audit committee at a defined frequency (at least every six months)
  • Non-executive directors have been briefed on their assurance responsibilities under the C&C Standard
Checklist: 3/5 confirmed — 40–74% — Amber suggested. Accept below or set your own.
RAG rating — override at any time
Notes
Flag as priority for action plan

Theme 5 — R&M Delivery Capability

Competence and conduct in the R&M function is ultimately judged by service outcomes for tenants. This theme looks at whether staff delivering R&M services have the knowledge and behaviours to deliver a high-quality, responsive service — and whether that is evidenced through performance data.

0 / 7 outcomes rated
0 green · 0 amber · 0 red
DE01
R&M manager knowledge of regulatory and legal framework
Managers can demonstrate up-to-date knowledge of obligations relevant to repairs, safety and asset management.
0 / 6
Not rated
Evidence checklist
  • All R&M managers have completed training on Awaab's Law Phase 1 and understand the timescales, documentation requirements and consequences of non-compliance
  • All R&M managers have received training on the Building Safety Act 2022 relevant to their role — and can describe their responsibilities
  • R&M managers are aware of HHSRS Category 1 hazards and the obligation to act within defined timescales
  • Knowledge of key legal obligations (s11 Landlord and Tenant Act, Defective Premises Act, Right to Repair) is included in induction for new R&M managers
  • A regulatory update process exists — when new obligations arise, R&M managers are briefed within a defined timescale
  • Knowledge checks or assessments are used to verify understanding of key regulatory obligations — not just training completion records
Tick items above to generate a RAG suggestion.
RAG rating — override at any time
Notes
Flag as priority for action plan
DE02
Contractor and supply chain competence management
Where R&M services are outsourced, competence and conduct requirements flow through to managing agents and contractors.
0 / 5
Not rated
Evidence checklist
  • Contracts with principal R&M contractors include requirements relating to staff competence, training and conduct standards
  • Any organisation to which housing management services (including R&M management) are outsourced has been assessed for C&C Standard scope and requirements
  • Contractor performance reviews include assessment of how their staff treat tenants — not just cost, time and quality targets
  • Complaints about contractor staff behaviour are investigated and fed back to the contractor with a formal response required
  • The in-house R&M team has sufficient competence to manage and challenge contractor performance — skill gaps in contract management have been identified
Tick items above to generate a RAG suggestion.
RAG rating — override at any time
Notes
Flag as priority for action plan
DE03
Tenant experience in the R&M service reflects professional conduct
Service outcomes, complaints data and satisfaction results demonstrate that competent, respectful service is being delivered.
0 / 5
Not rated
Evidence checklist
  • Repair satisfaction (RP02 TSM) is collected and results are above the RSH sector median — or there is an active improvement plan
  • Complaints about R&M service quality and staff behaviour are tracked separately and their root causes are analysed at least quarterly
  • Tenant feedback from completed repairs is reviewed by R&M managers and used to drive specific service improvements
  • The connection between staff competence, conduct and tenant outcomes is made explicit in management reporting — not just tracked in isolation
  • At least one service improvement to R&M delivery in the last 12 months has been directly linked to a competence or conduct issue identified through feedback or complaints
Tick items above to generate a RAG suggestion.
RAG rating — override at any time
Notes
Flag as priority for action plan

Theme 6 — Assurance

The RSH takes an assurance-based approach to the C&C Standard — providers must be able to demonstrate compliance, not just assert it. For the R&M function this means having systems that generate evidence of competence and conduct, and that surface failures before they reach the regulator.

1 / 5 outcomes rated
1 green · 0 amber · 0 red
AS01
Self-assurance framework for C&C compliance in R&M
Internal processes that generate ongoing assurance of competence and conduct across the R&M function.
6 / 6
Green — Ready
Evidence checklist
  • An internal self-assessment of C&C readiness across the R&M function has been completed in the last 12 months
  • The self-assessment has been reviewed and challenged by a function independent of R&M (e.g. internal audit, compliance or the board)
  • An audit trail of evidence supporting C&C compliance claims exists and is accessible — training records, qualification registers, appraisal completion rates
  • A gap log or improvement tracker is maintained, recording all known C&C shortfalls with owners and target closure dates
  • The organisation could respond to an RSH inquiry about R&M staff competence and conduct with structured documentary evidence within a reasonable timescale
  • Lessons from any regulatory engagement (own or peers') relating to staff competence or conduct are actively reviewed and applied
Checklist: 6/6 confirmed — 75%+ — Green suggested. Accept below or set your own.
RAG rating — override at any time
Notes
Flag as priority for action plan

⚑ Flagged priorities

Outcome areas you have marked as priorities across all six themes — your action plan focus areas.

  • No priorities flagged yet. Use the ⚑ flag on any outcome to add it here.
↑ Back to top